Brilliant insights from a famous gunfighter...

"PC is a mental disease that ensues from hanging around too many low testosterone metro sexual liberals"

"Because some dope-smoking liberal anti-American chose to turn that word into something bad is no reason to discard it"

Sigh. I just don't get somethings...

I mean, I'm all for mass quantities of steak, potatoes, coffee, whiskey and scars, but at the same
time I really like silk sheets, espresso, fresh baked bread, and eating tofu.

So, what exactly does "low testosterone" or "metro sexual" connote to that authors mind?
I dunno... What if I was a gay, californian foodie that really liked guns? Would that exclude me from the tactical mindset? Would that make them less capable of killing someone and dealing with the aftermath?

My point isn't to call the author of those brilliant fucking insights into a debate about the emasculation of the American male or some crap like that, but rather to illustrate a point that those sentiments don't really matter. Being gay, metrosexual, a doper, a red-blooded american, or a commie doesn't make anyone more or less capable of killing people or exercising their right to bear arms.

Lenin stomped the crap out of a lot of folks.
Himmler was into freaky stuff like cross dressing and he killed a lot of folks.
The Greeks and Romans conquered most of the world and engaged in homosexual activity.

Being a liberal, from a political point of view, may render you incapable of performing the indicated response. But, hell, drinking too much of either parties kool-aid may very well render you incapable of performing the indicated response too.

Let's get to the crux of the issue: Anyone who is out to take your guns and pass more laws restricting your 2nd A rights is the enemy. It doesn't matter if they are gay or straight, democrap or rebulicrat, metrosexual and PC or Merle Duffy-esque.